PERBANDINGAN PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN KHARISMATIK DAN TRANSAKSIONAL TERHADAP KINERJA GURU DI MADRASAH ALIYAH DALAM MENDUKUNG PENDIDIKAN BERKUALITAS
PERBANDINGAN PENGARUH KEPEMIMPINAN KHARISMATIK DAN TRANSAKSIONAL TERHADAP KINERJA GURU DI MADRASAH ALIYAH DALAM MENDUKUNG PENDIDIKAN BERKUALITAS
Isi Artikel Utama
Ima Rahmawati
Titin Rustini
Sapari
Reva Luthfiah Ash Shidqi
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dan membandingkan pengaruh kepemimpinan kharismatik dan kepemimpinan transaksional terhadap kinerja guru pada Madrasah Aliyah swasta di Kabupaten Bogor dalam mendukung pendidikan berkualitas. Pendekatan penelitian menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan desain survei komparatif eksplanatori terhadap 120 guru yang dipilih melalui teknik proportional random sampling. Pengumpulan data dilakukan menggunakan kuesioner skala Likert dan dianalisis dengan Structural Equation Modeling berbasis AMOS. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kedua jenis kepemimpinan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja guru, dengan kepemimpinan kharismatik memiliki pengaruh lebih kuat (β=0,52) dibandingkan kepemimpinan transaksional (β=0,34). Model penelitian telah memenuhi kriteria goodness of fit serta menunjukkan validitas dan reliabilitas konstruk yang baik. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa dimensi visi, inspirasi, dan keteladanan menjadi faktor dominan dalam meningkatkan kinerja guru, dengan tetap mempertimbangkan peran mekanisme struktural dalam menjaga disiplin, konsistensi, dan pencapaian target organisasi secara berkelanjutan.
Asbari, M., Santoso, P. B., & Purwanto, A. (2020). The effect of leadership style on teacher performance. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3982760
Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2019). A meta-analytic review of leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818790998
Buil, I., Martínez, E., & Matute, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and employee performance. European Management Journal, 37(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2018.10.003
Bush, T. (2019). School leadership and management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(5), 677–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219858295
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 567–594. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20940661
Lestari, F., Rahmawati, I., Lestari, H., & Ihsan, M. (2023). Kompensasi terhadap kinerja guru SMK. Jurnal Kajian Islam Modern, 10(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.56406/jkim.v10i01.339
Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119595849
Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership for learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2020-0045
Hidayat, R., et al. (2022). Leadership in Islamic education. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 5(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.25217/jier.v5i2.2345
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical leadership styles matter? Journal of Management, 44(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314544744
Jensen, U. T., et al. (2020). Leadership and performance. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13136
Labuem, S., Sari, E., Salamun, S., Yulianda, A., Arianti, I., Tangio, J. S., et al. (2025). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: Panduan praktis. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). School leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Nguyen, D., et al. (2020). Leadership and organizational outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219868202
OECD. (2019). Education indicators. OECD Publishing.
Purba, S., Awal, R., Simarmata, N. I. P., Sihotang, D. O., Tasrim, I. W., Rahmawati, I., et al. (2024). Kepemimpinan dalam manajemen pendidikan. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Rahmawati, I., Lestari, H., Rustini, T., & Kirana, A. P. (2026). The Influence Of Sustainable Leadership On The Effectiveness Of Environmental Sustainability Programs In Private Madrasah Aliyah In Bogor Regency. Jurnal Kajian Islam Modern, 14(01), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.56406/jkim.v14i01.993
Rahmawati, I., Rifatunisa, A., Apriani, R., & Rustini, T. (2025). Pengaruh keseimbangan kehidupan kerja terhadap kinerja guru wanita di Madrasah Aliyah swasta Kabupaten Bogor. Educational Management Reviews and Research, 4(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.56406/emrr.v4i1.762
Rahmawati, I. (2024). Supervisi akademik kepala sekolah terhadap kinerja mengajar guru di SMAN 1 cibungbulang. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 6(2), 797-804. https://doi.org/10.47467/reslaj.v6i2.4978
Rizkiyah, N., et al. (2021). Teacher performance in madrasah. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v7i1.12000
Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. (2020). Leadership and student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20932440
Setiawan, A., et al. (2021). Islamic school leadership. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2), 789–808. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14244a
Sibuea, B., Salamun, S., Purba, S., Zainuri, A., Rahmawati, I., Purba, D. S., et al. (2023). Pengantar kepemimpinan pembelajaran. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report. UNESCO.
World Bank. (2020). Education policy perspective. https://www.worldbank.org
